OUR CONTACTS


PO Box 16122 Collins Street West Victoria 8007 Australia

(+23) 345 322 233

Lifetime Income and the Architecture of a Good Retirement

HomeResearchLifetime Income and the Architecture of a Good Retirement
WHITE PAPER · 2026 EDITION

Retirement is not only a savings problem. It is an income problem. This paper reviews recent research on what happens when part of a retiree’s savings is converted into guaranteed lifetime income. The evidence points in one direction: income structure changes how long people live, how freely they spend, and how much stress they carry.

Published by My Annuity Store, Inc. Written for conservative retirement investors, retirees, and the professionals who serve them, with a focus on households holding $1 million to $2 million in investable assets. Educational use only.

WHAT THE RESEARCH FOUND
0
%
LOWER MORTALITY AT 5 YEARS
0
%
LOWER MORTALITY AT 10 YEARS
0
%
OF LIFETIME INCOME GETS SPENT
0
%
PREFER $10K INCOME OVER $140K WEALTH

Sources: Larrain, Previtero and Severino (NBER, 2026); Blanchett and Finke (LIMRA, April 2025; Retirement Income Institute, June 2024). Full citations below.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

A PORTFOLIO TELLS YOU WHAT YOU OWN. A PAYCHECK TELLS YOU WHAT YOU CAN USE.

Retirement planning has traditionally been framed as a savings problem: accumulate enough, invest prudently, withdraw carefully. That framework is incomplete. For retirees who have saved well but still worry about markets, taxes, inflation, healthcare, and longevity, the central question is no longer “How much do I have?” It is “What kind of income will my savings produce for the rest of my life?”

The research reviewed in this paper suggests guaranteed lifetime income shapes retirement in three ways. It improves financial security by protecting against outliving assets. It improves behavior by giving retirees the confidence to spend appropriately. And it may improve well-being by reducing financial stress and simplifying decisions.

The practical implication for a household with $1 million to $2 million is not that every dollar should be annuitized. It is that a portion of savings may be most useful when converted from an uncertain account balance into a predictable paycheck. A well-designed plan pairs guaranteed income for essential expenses with a flexible portfolio for growth, liquidity, emergencies, and legacy goals.

SECTIONS 1 AND 2

THE LONGEVITY EFFECT

For most of the twentieth century a pension turned years of work into a monthly check for life. Today the responsibility has shifted to households, who now manage longevity risk, market volatility, withdrawal rates, taxes, and healthcare uncertainty on their own. Successful savers are not immune to fear. They have enough wealth to protect and enough uncertainty to make disciplined spending difficult.

The strongest evidence that income structure affects health comes from the NBER working paper “The Effect of Annuities on Longevity” by Borja Larrain, Alessandro Previtero, and Felipe Severino. It examines administrative payout data on roughly 600,000 Chilean retirees from 2004 to 2022. To reduce selection bias, the authors use the fact that annuity sales vary with recent market returns as an instrument. They find that annuitization substantially reduces mortality at five and ten year horizons, with reported reductions of about 2.55% and 3.62%.

The prudent way to state this is not “annuities make you live longer.” It is that large-scale research finds annuitization is associated with a meaningful reduction in mortality, likely through reduced stress, lower income volatility, and greater investment in health.

SECTIONS 3 THROUGH 6

STRESS, SPENDING, AND THE LICENSE TO SPEND

The link between financial stress and health is not only intuitive. A population study of 60-year-olds in Stockholm County found financial stress was associated with higher risk of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality. Retirees do not experience market volatility as a chart. They experience it as uncertainty about income, dignity, and the possibility of becoming a burden. A guaranteed income stream can interrupt that pathway by reducing the number of core expenses exposed to markets.

Blanchett and Finke find retirees spend roughly 80% of lifetime income but less than half of wage and capital income. Withdrawal rates from savings were about 2.1% for married 65-year-old households and 1.9% for singles, well below common guidance. Their preference test is the most striking finding: 59.4% of respondents said they would feel more comfortable spending on nonessentials with $10,000 of additional income rather than $140,000 of additional wealth. People frame money by its source, and guaranteed income feels safer to use than principal.

Underspending is one of the least discussed costs of retirement. Poterba, Venti, and Wise describe how households treat home equity and non-annuitized assets as precautionary savings, drawn down mainly after shocks such as the death of a spouse or a major medical bill. The money is technically available but psychologically protected. Guaranteed income changes the frame from “how much principal can I afford to spend?” to “how do I use this month’s deposit?”

SECTION 8

A FRAMEWORK FOR THE $1MM TO $2MM RETIREE

The strongest approach is usually not all annuity or no annuity. It is segmentation. Different dollars get different jobs.

1. ESSENTIAL FLOOR

Housing, food, insurance, transportation, property taxes, core healthcare. Cover as much as practical with Social Security, pensions, and annuity income.

2. LIFESTYLE SPENDING

Travel, dining, hobbies, family, giving. Guaranteed income gives permission to spend without treating each decision as a loss of principal.

3. FLEXIBLE PORTFOLIO

Inflation protection, liquidity, long-term care, tax-sensitive withdrawals, and legacy. More resilient once essential income is protected.

4. EMERGENCY RESERVE

Avoid over-committing liquid assets to anything irreversible. Partial annuitization balances certainty and flexibility.

5. REVISIT REGULARLY

Health, spending, tax law, rates, inflation, and family priorities change. Re-evaluate the role of guaranteed income alongside the full plan.

“THE BEST RETIREMENT INCOME PLAN IS NOT ALWAYS THE ONE THAT MAXIMIZES THEORETICAL WEALTH. IT IS THE ONE THAT HELPS A RETIREE LIVE WITH CONFIDENCE, SPEND WITH PURPOSE, AND PRESERVE DIGNITY FOR LIFE.”

 

– From the paper’s conclusion

REFERENCES

SOURCES AND ENDNOTES

This white paper is educational and should not be interpreted as individualized investment, tax, legal, or insurance advice. Guarantees are backed by the claims-paying ability of the issuing insurance company. Product features, fees, surrender provisions, liquidity, tax treatment, and suitability should be reviewed carefully before purchase. Annuities are not appropriate for every investor.

  1. Larrain, Previtero and Severino, “The Effect of Annuities on Longevity.” NBER Working Paper, 2026. Administrative payout data on about 600,000 Chilean retirees, 2004 to 2022.
  2. Blanchett and Finke, “Retirees Spend More With Lifetime Income.” LIMRA Retirement Income Institute note, April 2025.
  3. Carlsson et al., “Financial stress in late adulthood and diverse risks of incident cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in women and men.” BMC Public Health, 2014.
  4. Blanchett and Finke, “Guaranteed Income: A License to Spend.” Retirement Income Institute original research, June 2024.
  5. Poterba, Venti and Wise, “The Composition and Draw-down of Wealth in Retirement.” NBER Working Paper 17536, revised July 2013.
  6. Employee Benefit Research Institute and Greenwald Research, “2026 Retirement Confidence Survey.”
  7. PLANADVISER, “Retirement Confidence Remains High, As Does Interest in Income Options.” April 25, 2025.

Copyright 2026 My Annuity Store, Inc. Full citations with links are in the PDF.

READ THE FULL PAPER

Nine pages, four figures, seven sources. Free, no email required.